Claude vs GeminiSame prompts, side by side.
Opus 5.5 and Gemini 4 Argon. Five work prompts. The full answers, with checks you can inspect.
How do Claude and Gemini compare?
You can use both in Bearly. Below, we sent the same five work prompts to the models behind Claude and Gemini, using their APIs on October 29, 2026. Read the unedited answers side by side and inspect the Python tests and arithmetic check. These are single examples, not an overall ranking. In Bearly, Council of Experts can ask both at once and summarize their answers; it requires Pro or higher.
The models in Bearly
Names and retention labels come from Bearly’s current public catalog. The dated outputs below use the exact API model IDs shown here. Opus 5.5 requires Pro or higher.
| Model facts | Opus 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| ZDR in Bearly | Zero data retention | Zero data retention |
| API model tested | claude-opus-5-5 | gemini-4-argon |
ZDR here describes chat models in Bearly. These direct API examples did not run through Bearly’s privacy controls. Set up ZDR-only · Encrypt new chats end to end
Read the answers.
Each prompt is identical across all four models. Long answers open in place. Word counts use whitespace-separated words, including any Markdown markers.
Prompt 1 of 5
Rewrite a project update
Read the exact prompt
Rewrite this paragraph for clarity in at most 80 words. Keep every fact, deadline, and action. Return only the revised paragraph. Due to the fact that the export currently has an issue in which it drops the timezone on some dates, which was noticed by QA yesterday, we are going to not ship it on Tuesday as previously planned. It is now the plan to ship on Thursday provided that the fix from Mira is reviewed by Leon by Wednesday at noon and QA has verified it by Wednesday at 5 p.m. Please inform support of the change today.
Opus 5.5
51 words · Unedited API response
QA found yesterday that the export drops the timezone on some dates, so we will not ship on Tuesday as planned. We now plan to ship on Thursday, provided Leon reviews Mira's fix by noon Wednesday and QA verifies it by 5 p.m. Wednesday. Please inform support of the change today.
Gemini 4 Argon
56 words · Unedited API response
Yesterday, QA noticed that the export drops the timezone on some dates. Because of this issue, we will not ship on Tuesday as planned. We now plan to ship on Thursday, provided Leon reviews Mira’s fix by Wednesday at noon and QA verifies it by Wednesday at 5 p.m. Please inform support of this change today.
Prompt 2 of 5
Summarize a source in five bullets
Read the exact prompt
Summarize the following excerpt in exactly five bullets for someone reading a source brief. Use only information in the excerpt. Keep the whole summary under 100 words. Return only the five bullets. Source: U.S. Constitution, Preamble (public domain), National Archives: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.U.S. Constitution, Preamble — National Archives (public domain)
Opus 5.5
75 words · Unedited API response
- **Source of authority:** "We the People of the United States" ordain and establish the Constitution. - **Unity and justice:** It aims to form "a more perfect Union" and "establish Justice." - **Peace and security:** It seeks to "insure domestic Tranquility" and "provide for the common defence." - **Public well-being:** It intends to "promote the general Welfare." - **Lasting liberty:** It aims to "secure the Blessings of Liberty" for the present generation and its "Posterity."
Gemini 4 Argon
75 words · Unedited API response
* The people of the United States ordain and establish the Constitution for the United States of America. * One stated purpose of the Constitution is to form a more perfect Union and establish Justice. * The document aims to insure domestic Tranquility and provide for the common defence. * Another goal is to promote the general Welfare. * Finally, the Constitution seeks to secure the Blessings of Liberty for the people and their Posterity.
Prompt 3 of 5
Write and test a Python function
Read the exact prompt
Write a Python 3 function merge_intervals(intervals). Input is a list of (start, end) integer tuples representing half-open intervals. Return a new sorted list of tuples merging overlapping intervals. Touching intervals must stay separate: [(1, 3), (3, 5)] stays unchanged. Do not mutate the input. An empty input returns []. Raise ValueError if any start >= end. Use only the standard library. Return only one fenced Python code block, with the function and any needed imports, no tests.
We will run these checks:
assert merge_intervals([]) == []
assert merge_intervals([(5, 8), (1, 4), (3, 6)]) == [(1, 8)]
assert merge_intervals([(1, 3), (3, 5)]) == [(1, 3), (3, 5)]
assert merge_intervals([(1, 9), (2, 3), (1, 9)]) == [(1, 9)]
assert merge_intervals([(-5, -1), (-3, 2), (4, 7)]) == [(-5, 2), (4, 7)]
items = [(5, 8), (1, 4)]; original = items.copy(); merge_intervals(items); assert items == original
for invalid in [[(2, 2)], [(4, 1)], [(1, 3), (8, 7)]]:
try:
merge_intervals(invalid)
except ValueError:
pass
else:
raise AssertionError('Expected ValueError')We ran the supplied checks with Python 3.9.6: empty input, overlap chain, touching intervals, containment, negative bounds, input unchanged, and three invalid-interval cases. Passing these nine checks does not establish correctness for every input.
Opus 5.5
67 words · Unedited API response
```python
def merge_intervals(intervals):
for start, end in intervals:
if start >= end:
raise ValueError(f"Invalid interval: ({start}, {end}); start must be less than end")
if not intervals:
return []
sorted_intervals = sorted(intervals)
merged = []
cur_start, cur_end = sorted_intervals[0]
for start, end in sorted_intervals[1:]:
if start < cur_end:
if end > cur_end:
cur_end = end
else:
merged.append((cur_start, cur_end))
cur_start, cur_end = start, end
merged.append((cur_start, cur_end))
return merged
```Python checks: 9/9 passed
Gemini 4 Argon
57 words · Unedited API response
```python
def merge_intervals(intervals):
for start, end in intervals:
if start >= end:
raise ValueError(f"Invalid interval ({start}, {end}): start must be < end")
if not intervals:
return []
sorted_intervals = sorted(intervals)
merged = [sorted_intervals[0]]
for current_start, current_end in sorted_intervals[1:]:
last_start, last_end = merged[-1]
if current_start < last_end:
merged[-1] = (last_start, max(last_end, current_end))
else:
merged.append((current_start, current_end))
return merged
```Python checks: 9/9 passed
Prompt 4 of 5
Check a capacity calculation
Read the exact prompt
A workshop has 240 seats. At the start of the day, three-fifths of all seats are booked. Then 18 bookings are cancelled and 37 new bookings arrive. The organizer must also reserve 12 seats for crew; crew seats are separate from attendee bookings. How many seats are still available for new attendees? Show your calculation briefly, then end with exactly 'Answer: N seats', replacing N with the number.
Expected answer: 65 seats. Calculation: 240 − (240 × 3/5 − 18 + 37) − 12 = 65.
Opus 5.5
46 words · Unedited API response
**Calculation:** 1. Initial bookings: 3/5 × 240 = **144** seats 2. After changes: 144 − 18 + 37 = **163** attendee bookings 3. Seats taken in total: 163 attendees + 12 crew = **175** 4. Seats still available: 240 − 175 = **65** Answer: 65 seats
Final answer: 65 seats · Correct on this problem
Gemini 4 Argon
46 words · Unedited API response
* Initial bookings: $\frac{3}{5} \times 240 = 144$ seats
* Updated attendee bookings: $144 - 18 + 37 = 163$ seats
* Total unavailable seats (attendees + crew): $163 + 12 = 175$ seats
* Available seats: $240 - 175 = 65$ seats
Answer: 65 seatsFinal answer: 65 seats · Correct on this problem
Prompt 5 of 5
Explain a technical concept
Read the exact prompt
Explain database indexes to a new operations analyst who knows spreadsheets but has never used a database. Use one concrete example and explain one cost of adding an index. Stay under 150 words. Return only the explanation.
Opus 5.5
136 words · Unedited API response
Read full answer from Opus 5.5
A database table is like a huge spreadsheet. Say you want every order from the customer "Acme." Normally the database reads every row from top to bottom, like scrolling through a million-row sheet looking for matches. An index is a separate, sorted lookup list, like the index at the back of a book. An index on the CustomerName column lists each name alphabetically, with pointers to the exact rows where it appears. The database can jump straight to "Acme" and grab only those rows, turning a slow, full-table search into a near-instant lookup. The cost is that every time a row is added, changed, or deleted, the database must also update the index to keep it sorted. Indexes make reading faster but writing slower. That's why you index the columns people search often, not every column.
Gemini 4 Argon
145 words · Unedited API response
Read full answer from Gemini 4 Argon
Imagine a massive spreadsheet of 100,000 customer orders sorted by Order Date. If you need to find every order for "Customer X," you have to scan every single row from top to bottom. In a database, this is a slow "full table scan." A database index solves this. It works like a hidden, second tab in your spreadsheet that lists only Customer Names alphabetically, right next to the exact row numbers where their orders live in the main tab. When you search for "Customer X," the database checks this alphabetical index, grabs the row numbers, and jumps straight to the data instantly. However, indexes have a cost: they slow down data entry. Every time you add, delete, or edit an order in your main table, the database must also take time to update and re-sort that hidden index tab, while also using extra storage space.
Date and method
Outputs from each model’s API on October 29, 2026; Bearly offers the same models. One independent request per prompt and model, with no system prompt, history, tools, browsing, or retries of completed answers. Each request allowed 4,096 output tokens; temperature and reasoning settings were left at provider defaults. Defaults and token accounting can differ by provider. Answers are unedited and reused wherever the same model appears. This is a small, dated demonstration, not a repeated benchmark or a comparison of the companies’ apps. Bearly publishes this page and offers the models.
Rewrite and explanation prompts use fictional work examples. The summary uses the public-domain U.S. Constitution preamble. We report code checks, a final-number match, and word counts; we do not score prose quality or source coverage.
Questions about the comparison
- Does this compare the Claude and Gemini apps?
- This page compares the named models through their APIs. It does not test the ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Grok apps, their tools, subscriptions, or system instructions. Model access in Bearly is not a subscription to another company’s app.
- Can I use both models in one app?
- Yes. Bearly includes Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Grok. Switch models in a chat, or ask Council of Experts to consult several at once and return their answers plus a summary. Council requires Pro or higher and uses multiple responses. Opus 5.5 also requires Pro or higher.
- Which AI gives the most privacy?
- In Bearly, the table shows each model’s current zero-data-retention label from our public catalog. Turn on ZDR-only to keep chat requests on zero-retention models, and turn on end-to-end encryption for new chats. The API requests used for these examples did not run through Bearly’s privacy controls.
- Will I get the same answers?
- An answer can change between runs. Different instructions, context, settings, and tools can also change it. The checks below establish only what happened on these specific prompts; they do not establish general accuracy or a model ranking.
Use both in Bearly.
Ask Council of Experts to consult both models and return each answer plus a summary. Council requires Pro or higher and uses multiple responses.